Search This Blog
Thursday, March 28, 2013
The MKIII Supra from Hell
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Friday, March 15, 2013
Obama Sequester
President Obama, stop acting like an oligarch. nobody believes it anymore. You cut White House tours that cost "$74K a week" because of sequester, but still fly around in Air Force One which costs $180k an hour. You still go golfing with your celebrity buddies and take expensive vacations. Maybe you could cut back on the once a month Vaca and allow a few weeks of tours instead. You know....balance it out...for the good of the people. Nobody else gets to jet around the world for vacation once a month or every other month except for the top 1% and you say they should pay their fair share. Pay your fair share and give some back. Set the example.
Monday, March 11, 2013
Political Lies in Socrates Imaginary City
The
goal of the conversation between Socrates and the others in the republic was to
come up with an imaginary, ideal city where all involved would show a sense of brother
ship and an overall vision of peace and luxury to others that came to see the
city. Throughout the reading man conundrums rear their heads to the characters.
It is decided that the people can’t live as human nature would suggest, but
they would have to live under rules that fool them into thinking everything is
good, luxurious, and at peace. In order to create this sense of peace, luxury,
and cohesion of all people in the city Socrates says that the city leaders must
be told a lie. This idea is formed from the base that there will be 3 distinct
classes; the gold class, guardians, will govern the people, the silver class,
the people who will produce luxury for the city, and the bronze class that will
produce the bare necessities for the city. The whole purpose of the lie was to
get the city to adhere into one functioning unit.
The
lie addresses many topics. It deals with the feeling of being stuck as you are.
It speaks to the fact that even though the people are assigned to certain
classes based on what they do, will be able to have children that move to
another class and won’t be stuck with the same job as their father. This is
saying that the offspring of guardian parents might not end up as guardians
themselves. The children will do the job that is appropriate to them. This is
the same with children of other parents. They will do as their talents
illustrate. Another part of the lie
deals with the guardians and keeping them civil and civic minded. Socrates said
to prohibit the guardians getting wealth so that they will exist just to serve
the people. He isn’t making the desire for wealth to disappear he is just
making the ability of it to happen disappear. He wants the guardians not to be
people who are getting more for themselves or getting things that they desire.
He is making a rule that makes them act like people that have no desires. Since
the only possessions that they have are the ones that they share in common.
Adamantus says that the guardians won’t like this. People won’t want to live in
a city where the only things they have are the things that they have in common. Especially in a city where they are
protecting people with wealth. It won’t make them happy. Socrates in answering adamantus shifts his
view. He says that when we founded this city it was not our object to make one
class of people less happy than others; the object was to make the city as a
whole happy. He later discusses their role and the role of families. Every
person has a certain nature that is equipped for one certain job. Socrates
tries to get away from this idea because how classes are divided. It’s like
some people are trained to think and some are just trained to work. Women make
this a problem. On the one hand nature seems to have distinguished women from
men. Women are like specialized labor classes. Men have different jobs, but
women are child bearers and homemakers but they can do jobs also. Socrates says
that the division of labor thought about before wasn’t well thought out.
Different natures shouldn’t do the same jobs the whole problem with the city is
getting it to go together. Referring to what the professor says, maybe the city
was already together but they didn’t see it.
The case of
women displays an point of this. The women will be homemakers and mothers.
Women who do all the different jobs those men do now, it turns out, that every
one of these differences is a similarity to men but they are all still women.
They are mothers because it is what they do. Instead of the way people were
divided like different types before, now they are looked at as a whole group
with different talents. Socrates then goes on to describe the system of child
rearing. The breeding will be decided upon by experts in the city. The children
will never know who their family is. Everyone in the city should feel as if
they are connected like family to everyone in the city. So they will call
another person brother or son just because they don’t know. The reason for this
is to create cohesion. This exposes another problem. It would be solidarity
that is imposed upon the people. The idea that no one is ever going to know who
their relatives are can create cohesion. It brings out a kind of good feeling
that is naturally inside us towards others
Socrates has
kind of discovered the idea of brotherhood. In order for there to be
brotherhood everyone has to think that everyone was their brother and the fact
that classes are organized for the good of everyone. The point of the lie wasn’t bad. It’s a lot
like the way our government operates today. They do what they feel is best for
the whole of society, but it doesn’t address us as individuals. A good
illustration of this is the problems surrounding Four Loko. I honestly think
the drink is disgusting, but I don’t believe that its best for the whole of
society to take that choice away. Lying
to the people and saying its dangerous is a lie. The ingredients of the drink
have been consumed safely apart and together. How long have people been
drinking coffee after a long night at the bar? How many people have ended up in
the hospital from drinking too much alcohol by itself?
Friday, March 8, 2013
Antigone's Gods
Antigone’s Gods
The
tragic play of Antigone showcases a young woman in a dire situation. Caught
between moral rocks, she must make decisions based on what she feels as being
right or easy. She shows throughout the play that she is a very strong woman
and very religious. The Greek gods play a big influence on the choices she
makes, and also shows a big contrast between several major characters in the
book.
In
this play the main character Antigone shows much moral courage. The beginning
of the play opens to her trying to convince her sister to do something that was
commanded by divinity and bury their dead brother so he could move forward in
the after live. The issue with this action is that the new ruler, Creon, will
shortly be making a proclamation that nobody will give respect to the body of
the man and bury him (her brother attacked the city because he didn’t get his
year as being the ruler like agreed). This one choice that Antigone has made
that gives the tragedy its forward momentum to a tragic end. This one choice to
follow the rules of the gods over the rules of man shows much character and
religious backbone.
Some
insight into the mind of Antigone can be gleamed from several important
quotations. In the very beginning of the play, when she was outside the wall of
the city talking with her sister Ismene she stated “I shall be a criminal- but
a religious one. The time in which I must please those that are dead is longer
than I must please those of this world. For there I shall lie forever.” (85-90)
This one quotation sets the premise of every decision she makes throughout the
entirety of the play, and also shows how deeply religious she is. This says
that she doesn’t care as much what is going to happen in this life because the
length of time that she will be here will be small compared to the amount of
time that she will spend in the afterlife. It also means that honoring the laws
of man don’t mean as much as honoring the laws of the gods because she is going
to have to live under the laws of the gods for all eternity.
Another
important quotation from Antigone showing how firm she was in her choice was
directed at the ruler Creon after he found out that she had done the deed of
spreading the dust, minimalist burial, on the body of her brother. She tells
Creon that she doesn’t care what it is he said not to do because he is not god.
“Yes, it was not Zeus that made the proclamation; or gave it justice.”
(494-495) She goes on in the next quotation to explain further why she
committed the act that she did. “I did not believe your proclamation had such
power to enable one who will someday die to override god’s ordinances… They are
not of today and yesterday; they live forever; none knows of when they first
were. These laws whose penalties I would not incur from the gods, through the
fear of any man’s temper.”(496-504) Antigone basically sets forth in this
statement to Creon that she doesn’t care what he thinks. She won’t deny what
she did. She tells him that his words and his human power are not strong enough
to merit not following the god’s demand of the honor of burial.
Aside
from just looking at Antigone alone several comparisons can be made between her
and Creon and Ismene to exemplify how noble she is in making the choices that
she has made to this point. When you look at Creon you see a man that is
insecure in his position of power, but he is in a sense a power lover. Although
he is family to the throne it is only because his sister was queen and he was
the last choice in the line because everyone else was dead. He makes note of
the gods, attributing pushing the enemies back in the last battle to them and
their will. However he doesn’t make much more note of the gods from that point
on, whereas Antigone continues to reference them on and off throughout the
whole story. In comparing Creon to Antigone the more that is read and thought
about the more he seems like the attribution to the gods pushing the enemy back
would be more like telling the story of a family that says grace before a meal,
but is completely faithless. He puts up a façade of faith for the people. It
shows up when Antigone is speaking to him about how burial was an honor that is
commanded by the gods. He, in turn, responded to almost every point she made,
but when it came to referencing what she said about the gods, it was as if he
didn’t want to answer to it because he knew deep inside himself that she was
right. One of the only times that Creon talks about the gods, in reference to
Antigone, is when he says “In that place she shall call on Hades, god of death,
in her prayers. That god only she reviers. Perhaps she will win from him escape
from death or at least in that moment will recognize her honoring of the dead
is a labor lost.”(844-848) He is not really being serious when he is saying
this. He is speaking with a hint of sarcasm the whole time, and not at all
actually believing a god would help her. He is basically saying that when she
is locked in the tomb that he is sending her too with little food or supplies
she will cry to the god of death for help, but no way in hell will he do
anything for her. Maybe she will actually realize following the path she has
followed, burying her brother, was stupid and pointless. The only time in the
tragedy when Creon seemingly comes close to believing the gods is when the
blind seer comes to tell his prophetic vision. This isn’t however following or
believing the gods as Antigone does. Creon follows the seer because of a more
personal superstition. He has always taken the advice of the seer, so he will
continue to take the advice of the seer. One way of looking at it is, Antigone
believes in the Gods. She follows the ideology of the gods. Creon puts on a
face of believing the gods to win over the people. Deep inside however, he
believes more in the power of himself and his rules.
A
second person that is noteworthy to compare Antigone too, is her sister Ismene.
This is less of a black and white contrast as Creon to Antigone. Ismene is more
of a middle ground between the two of them. When Antigone asks Ismene to help
her bury the body of their brother Ismene won’t do it because she is scared of
the laws of man. “I will not put dishonor on them (the gods), but to act in
defiance of the citizenry, my nature does not give me the means for
that”(90-93). Ismene tells her sister Antigone that she does care about what
the gods think, but she also cares what the laws of man dictate. It is not
something that she could just go break the commandment from a ruler to do
something that is morally right in the eyes of the gods. Later in the play
Ismene does seem to convert more to how her sister thinks when she hears that
her sister has been condemned to death. She wants to die with her sister. It is
more out of guilt than actual faith in the gods though.
This
play has a lot of dynamic characteristics. Antigone’s faith in the gods is a
major role that shapes the play. All of the decisions that she made throughout
are based on the belief in gods. If she were to have taken the easy way out
this would have saved many people heartache. As a consequence to following a
divine command she dies, her future husband (Creon’s son), and Creon’s wife
dies. If I were Antigone and in this situation I would have a hard time making
the same decision that she made. I would have followed more in the path of Ismene.
It is quite brave and noble to put yourself at risk to honor the dead and
follow the commands of the gods. The comfort and the ease of making the choice
to leave the body of my brother to rot would be very tempting. It would be a
hard thing to do what I knew was right given the consequence of death if I were
to be caught burying the body. If I did indeed bury the body, I probably would
have been more secretive, and denied ever doing the deed. I’m sure the gods
would be more forgiving of lying to spare my life and neglecting the body of my
brother.
Labels:
antigone,
creon,
gods,
greek,
ismene,
jocasta,
mythology,
oedipus,
paper,
Sophocles,
spark notes,
sparknotes
NICS Background Checks Chart
Wonder what the trend for NICS background checks have been through 2012? Here you go.
Gun Control Scare=Amazing Gun Sales
Gun Control Scare=Amazing Gun Sales
Pro-Touring A-Body Chassis Parts
Want to freshen up your 64-72 A-Body? Don't want to pay for the kit? Here is a list of quality parts that I used to build my chassis. It saved me hundreds and I haven't one issue with fitment or use in the last two years. You will want to note the type of front control arm bushings that you have, the Pontiac lowers are oval, the Chevelle uses round. Also, this "kit" assumes you have front disk brakes. If you don't a conversion kit is needed.
All these parts can be ordered on
www.jegs.com
www.summitracing.com
www.advanceautoparts.com
www.autozone.com
All these parts can be ordered on
www.jegs.com
www.summitracing.com
www.advanceautoparts.com
www.autozone.com
Parts List
Advance Auto Parts
·
Wearever
Silver Brake Shoes (Front) FR246 1 $12.99 +$5 Core
·
Wearever
Silver Brake Shoes (Rear) FR245 1 $15.99 +$5 Core
·
USA Brake
Drum Hardware Combi-Kit 7008 1 $7.99
·
Tru-Torque
Drum Brake Wheel Cylinder
(Rear Right) W45873 1 $8.89
(Rear Right) W45873 1 $8.89
·
Tru-Torque
Drum Brake Wheel Cylinder
(Rear Left) W45873 1 $8.89
(Rear Left) W45873 1 $8.89
·
Reese
Wheel Bearing Kit 1’’ 72791 2 $13.99
Total
$222.69
+Tax
Jegs
·
Rear
Lower Control Arms 550-40082 1 $126.99
·
Red
Control Arm Bushing Set 355-3-3172R 1 $57.99
·
D52 Dual
Piston Caliper Kit 950-140-11291-R $374.99
·
Premium
Steering Rebuild Kit 515-CHESTR024 $314.99
·
Sway Bar
Set 350-52873 1 $351.99
·
Front KYB
Shock 575-343127 2 $22.99
·
Rear KYB
Shock 575-343157 2 $17.99
·
Edelbrock
Upper Control Arms 350-5268 1 $142.99
Total
$1451.90
+Tax
AutoZone
·
Duralast
Brake Rotor 5514 2 $54.99
·
Duralast
Brake Drum 8818 2 $45.99
Total
$201.96
+Tax
Summit
·
Eibach
Lowering Springs 3856.140 1 $249.11
Total with Tax/shipping
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)